The Methodist Home
for Children & Youth
Home | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Chapel

Children's Rights

Diagnostic & Assessment Services

Eagle's Nest Children's Center

Family Foster Care

Family Institute

Family Intervention (Intensive)

First/Best Placement

Group Homes

Higher Education

HOPE (Family Foster Care)

IMPACT

Independent Living Program

Intermediate Care

Residential Care

Rosalyn Carter Institute

Safe Kids/Safe Staff

STARS

Training

Wrap Around Services

"We intend to change the way Georgia treats its children." -Steve Rumford

 

 

Safe Kids/Safe Staff

The Methodist Home has been selected as a national demonstration site to improve methods and training programs to reduce physical restraints with youth in residential treatment. This program represents our commitment to treatment where all youth and staff are safe.

In September 2001, as part of its focus on reducing and eventually eliminating the use of restraint and seclusion, SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration) funded the three year Best Practices in Behavior Support and Intervention Project. The project sought to identify best practices in preventing and reducing the use of restraint and seclusion in facilities serving children and youth. To achieve this goal, the grant provided financial support for five demonstration sites and one coordinating center.

SAMHSA charged the demonstration sites with implementing model training programs and shifting their organizational culture to make their environments conducive to reducing the use of restraint and seclusion. The coordinating center was responsible for providing technical assistance to the sites, evaluating the outcomes of the various interventions implemented at each site, and disseminating the results of the project to promote best practices.

SAMHSA selected five demonstration sites based on their commitment to the goals of the project and their distinct proposed method. In each site, the project focused on improving the training and supervision of staff that work directly with children and youth. The five sites were:

• The University of Alabama Brewer Porch Children’s Center, Tuscaloosa, Alabama;

• The Connecticut Collaboration for Training Excellence, which divided funds among the Klingberg Family Centers, New Britain, Connecticut; the Devereux Glenholme School, Washington, Connecticut; and the Riverview Hospital, Middletown, Connecticut;

• Father Flanagan’s Girls and Boys’ Town, Boys Town, Nebraska, which contracted to provide technical assistance to the A.B. and Jessie Polinsky Children’s Center, San Diego, California;

• Lakeside Treatment and Learning Center, Kalamazoo, Michigan; and

• The Methodist Home for Children and Youth, Macon, Georgia. As a result of the SAMHSA grant, The Methodist Home has undertaken a number of important initiatives:

• Hiring practices have changed significantly to ensure staff can actually perform a physical restraint if necessary. Pre-employment screening is more rigorous than ever before in the agency.

• Clinicians conduct structured preadmission risk assessments on all children admitted into the agency. The clinicians share these at staff meetings prior to the child entering placement.

• Each child has a “functional analysis” of behavior completed by the cottage team during the initial placement period focusing on challenging behavior that is part of the “script” they come with.

• Staff and child debriefing protocols symbolize that both parties need agency attention and support following a crisis.

• Monthly practice of all restraint techniques by both staff and trainers is a critical component of skill retention.

• Agency trainers are also the supervisors, working in the programs on a daily basis, and as such, they are the “occupational experts” in the workplace, rather than being in the training department.

• Building the training infrastructure by having trainers in every cottage expands ownership of the techniques and philosophy of the agency’s crisis management program.

• Independent verification of training competence in restraint techniques give staff confidence that they truly are being judged as competent at the end of training. In the new system, the trainer who conducted the crisis management training is not allowed to test his or her participants at the end of the training session.

• Annual reaccredidation of all staff and trainers is vital to ongoing quality assurance efforts.

• Injury reporting to the training provider ensures continual dialogue and feedback on the techniques and special situations encountered during a restraint.

Most important, doing away with seclusion and eliminating the use of PRN medications had no effect on the frequency of restraint throughout the agency. In other words, The Methodist Home has learned these two interventions are not necessary to managing challenging behavior of our youth.